<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LexUtah &#187; United States Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexutah.com/tag/united-states-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexutah.com</link>
	<description>Utah's Legal Scene</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The New Pleading Standard in Federal Court Requires Greater Factual Content</title>
		<link>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Reich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Rules & Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell Atlantic v. Twombly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal v. Ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court is your new friend in seeking dismissal in federal district court.  Its Iqbal v. Ashcroft has been heralded as the “most significant Supreme Court decision in a decade for day-to-day litigation in the federal courts.”  Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) has filed legislation to force a reversal of Iqbal.  The uproar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pleasant Grove Prevails in Summum &#8220;Seven Aphorisms&#8221; Monument Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/pleasant-grove-prevails-in-summum-seven-aphorisms-monument-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/pleasant-grove-prevails-in-summum-seven-aphorisms-monument-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Reich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Rules & Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleasant Grove City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexutah.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court, via Justice Samuel Alito in a unanimous decision, found that “it is clear that the monuments in Pleasant Grove&#8217;s Pioneer Park represent government speech.”  Summum’s lawsuit was an attempt to force Pleasant Grove City, Utah, to erect a monument containing its “seven aphorisms” and be given equal space with other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/pleasant-grove-prevails-in-summum-seven-aphorisms-monument-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

