<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LexUtah &#187; pleading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexutah.com/tag/pleading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexutah.com</link>
	<description>Utah's Legal Scene</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The New Pleading Standard in Federal Court Requires Greater Factual Content</title>
		<link>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Reich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Rules & Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell Atlantic v. Twombly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal v. Ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court is your new friend in seeking dismissal in federal district court.  Its Iqbal v. Ashcroft has been heralded as the “most significant Supreme Court decision in a decade for day-to-day litigation in the federal courts.”  Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) has filed legislation to force a reversal of Iqbal.  The uproar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lexutah.com/new-rules-laws/the-new-pleading-standard-in-federal-court-requires-greater-factual-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Motion to Dismiss in Utah Is Not Limited to the Allegations in the Complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/your-motion-to-dismiss-in-utah-is-not-limited-to-the-allegations-in-the-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/your-motion-to-dismiss-in-utah-is-not-limited-to-the-allegations-in-the-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Reich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/your-motion-to-dismiss-in-utah-is-not-limited-to-the-allegations-in-the-complaint/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, in considering a motion made under Rule 12(b)(6), the court accepts the plaintiff’s allegations as true, drawing all reasonable inferences in plaintiff’s favor. See Russell v. Standard Corp., 898 P.2d 263, 264 (Utah 1995). Utah courts, however, insist that facts be plead&#8211; not conjecture, or speculation.  “[T]he sufficiency of [plaintiffs’] pleadings ‘must be determined [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lexutah.com/in-the-news/your-motion-to-dismiss-in-utah-is-not-limited-to-the-allegations-in-the-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

