A Final Order in Utah State Court Automatically Disposes of Any Prior Inconsistent Rulings

It seems like this principle comes up more often than it should: “When a final disposition of a case is entered by a district court, any unresolved motions inconsistent with that disposition are deemed resolved by implication.”  State v. Mullins, 2005 UT 43, ¶ 8, 116 P.3d 374.


© LexUtah | design by skybend