Utah Federal Court Is Where I Want to Be . . .
The 10th Circuit recently reviewed the differing standards and burdens applicable in motions for summary judgment in Milne v. USA Cycling. The court reviewed both Pearce v. Utah Athletic Foundation, 179 P.3d 760, 767 (Utah 2008) and Berry v. Greater Park City Co., 171 P.3d 442, 449 (Utah 2007) related to the proper summary judgment standard. Ultimately, however, the court found that “although we will look to Utah law to determine what elements the plaintiffs must prove at trial to prevail on their claims we will look exclusively to federal law to determine whether plaintiffs have provided enough evidence on each of those elements to withstand summary judgment.”
If you have a case for a defendant that is susceptible to a motion for summary judgment, get it out of state court and into federal court, and keep it there at all costs. Your chances of securing summary judgment are better. Happy hunting.
- Proposed Federal Civil Rule Changes: Rules 26 (experts) and 56 (summary judgment)
- Make a Clean Exit From Utah Federal Court
- Settlement Agreements Revisited
- Honorable David Kent Winder, Federal District Court Judge Passed Away May 19, 2009
- Utah Supreme Court Apportions Medical Expenses in Worker’s Compensation Cases
- Proposed Federal Civil Rule Changes: Rules 26 (experts) and 56 (summary judgment)
- Make a Clean Exit From Utah Federal Court
- Settlement Agreements Revisited
- Honorable David Kent Winder, Federal District Court Judge Passed Away May 19, 2009
- Utah Supreme Court Apportions Medical Expenses in Worker’s Compensation Cases




![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=91370b2e-e8b7-4578-ba89-7c0a0802342d)