A Final Order in Utah State Court Automatically Disposes of Any Prior Inconsistent Rulings

It seems like this principle comes up more often than it should: “When a final disposition of a case is entered by a district court, any unresolved motions inconsistent with that disposition are deemed resolved by implication.”  State v. Mullins, 2005 UT 43, ¶ 8, 116 P.3d 374.

• Utah State Bar Launches findautahlawyer.org– Meh.
• Utah Federal Court Is Where I Want to Be . . .
• Utah Law: Law of the Case Doctrine vs. Mandate Rule
• Utah Supreme Court Apportions Medical Expenses in Worker’s Compensation Cases
• Make a Clean Exit From Utah Federal Court